SKU: 98555355014

Antena Direccional / 3 ft / 5.9-7 GHz / Ganancia 34 dBi / SLANT de 45 ° y 90° / Incluye Jumpers con conector N-Macho a RPSMA / montaje y radomo incluido.

Sale price$8150.36 Regular price$9055.95
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $2263.99 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jun 16 - Jun 21

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Antena Direccional / 3 ft / 5.9-7 GHz / Ganancia 34 dBi / SLANT de 45 ° y 90° / Incluye Jumpers con conector N-Macho a RPSMA / montaje y radomo incluido.Especificaciones Elctricas: Rango de Frecuencia 5. 9 7. 2 Ghz Dimetro (cm) 96 Tipo de Antena Direccional Tipo de Conector N Hembra Ganancia (dBi) Baja 34 Media 35 Alta 36 VSWR: 1. 5 HPOL ancho de haz: 4. 3 VPOL ancho de haz: 4. 1 ISO: 30 dB F B Radio: 59 dB Polarizacin Dual: 45 o 90 Los jumper que incluye la antena son compatibles con los radios: C5c, AF5XHAD, R5ACLITE, RP5ACGEN2, LTUROCKET, RP5ACGEN2, EPMP 3K, FORCE300 CSM, C050940C121A,

Antena Direccional / 3 ft / 5.9-7 GHz / Ganancia 34 dBi / SLANT de 45  y 90 / Incluye Jumpers con conector N-Macho a RPSMA / montaje y radomo incluido.
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 98555355014

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 700 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
Consumer Reports
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
Fit great
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Halo Gray
Been a couple of months and they seem to be holding up nicely. Real picky about fit of socks and these fit well. They are very thin but very comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2024
B
Verified Purchase
Broussard Household.
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Always a win
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Under armor is always a win! Comfortable, no peeling, true to size, no squeezing around the arch of foot & affordable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
tab
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 4
Fit well and stay up
Size: Large, Color: (299) City Khaki / City Khaki / White
They're a little thin, so good mainly for warmer months. But they fit very well and I've not experienced any slippage
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2026
G
Verified Purchase
Gustavo Garcia
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
Llego a tiempo
Size: X-Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Bien
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026
V
Verified Purchase
ViperMageEx
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 3
Low quality socks.
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
I have been buying Under Armour undergarments for years and have noticed a steady decline in quality. These socks are no different. I purchased another six packs of very similar styled Under Armour socks in 2023 and recently they have started wearing out. Those socks are no longer available for reorder, but these extremely similar socks were so I ordered them. The quality difference is obvious just by looking at and feeling them. They are more of a faded black/brown than the black pictured or the black that the three year old socks still are. The material is completely different and feels lighter. When wearing them they already feel like they are bunching up in my shoes, which the old ones never did. I do not expect these to last even a year and will not buy them again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2026

recommand products